Resurrection

One peruses the front page of the newspaper, Inquirer, NY Times; it may be “all the news that’s fit to print,” but it is relentlessly not the “good news.” The overriding presence of violence and death is a given―across all cultures, countries, divides. We speak of “donor fatigue” from the overwhelming requests for aid, many worthy causes, desperate needs. Perhaps there is a “violence fatigue;” we lose our capacity for outrage witnessing the endless human capacity for self destruction.

Presence at funerals of friends, a ritual of aging, confronts us with our own impending death. Life has changed, not ended is the mantra of funerals. The Resurrection, the most profound leap of faith, bound to the Incarnation of Jesus, is the essence of our faith. One does wish our friends, who have gone before us, the cloud of witnesses, weren’t so silent in their “new life.” Hope needs constant renewal, even a bolstering of sorts, like a shot of Irish whiskey.

At a conference at Villanova University on “Who Is My Enemy! Religious Hope in a Time of Fear,” I encountered the writings of a Catholic priest/theologian, James Alison, offering unique insights to the Resurrection. Alison speaks of God’s “effervescent vivacity, free of any connection to death. We all have a deficient grasp of God. . . . All of us are marked by a vision of God that is too bound in by the circumstances, shot through with death, of human life on earth.” Alison’s writing at times borders on the mystifying. But that is the eternal problem when speaking of the divine. Bear with me, there is light at the end of the tunnel.

“Jesus perceives God as utterly without death, completely free from being involved in the death-bound structures of human life.” God’s effervescent vivacity, as in “John’s gospel shows how the central purpose behind what Jesus came to do was precisely to create a faith in the deathless and purely loving nature of God. . . . Being put to death by violent men was a creative act that was only possible because Jesus knew himself that God’s vivacity and love are un-shaded by death, and that his death can only be understood on our way out of it.”

Contrasting with God as abundant life personified in Jesus, Alison’s vision of original sin is our immersion―going back to Cain murdering his brother Abel through envy, in the reign of death. He calls the “great lie” our need for victims, many of whom come to be by our lethal greed; “the world shores up its security and peace at the expense of victims.” We have been formed in a culture obsessed with security, our survival and the inevitable punishment of any who threaten us. There are always victims in need of punishment. One remembers George Bush when Governor of Texas executing scores of human beings, a scandal to the “secular” European Union who had long banned this barbaric practice. The “great lie” encompasses many stories, the savage Native Americans, Cherokees among many, whom President Andrew Jackson virtually exterminated to facilitate our move West; the tragic history of African Americans; the demon Saddam destined for death, along with tens of thousands innocents.

Alison envisions “Jesus’ Resurrection” making possible the “construction of real human stories that are creatively able to undo the monotonous human story structured by grasping desire and murderous exclusion.” Jesus’ command “that we love one another as I have loved you” gives us a way out, a new way of being human.

“It needed to be possible that other people besides Jesus himself could come to the same perception and understanding of God as he. In this way alone could a new way of being human start to be created.” There were witnesses, Peter and the others, transformed. Peter in Acts vs. the Gospel is a new creation.

There is a touching story of Peter and five of his cohorts, after Jesus’ death, in the last chapter of John’s Gospel. Peter has returned to what he knows best, before meeting Jesus; “I’m going fishing.” They fished to no avail and then realized Jesus was on the shore with a charcoal fire preparing them breakfast. Peter leaps out of the boat and swims ashore; “the other disciples came in on the boat.” The impetuous Peter, filled with the broken humanity we all can identify with, is asked three times by Jesus, “Simon Peter, Do you love me?” Yes! The past is forgiven and the transformation begins, a more courageous Peter, a different vision.

Alison speaks to our inheriting the legacy, reminding us that not only does God love us, he likes us; being worthy is a non issue. “I no longer call you servants, but friends.”

The story of Phil Berrigan comes to mind to graphically illustrate a new way of being. Phil was a warrior on the field of battle in WWII, highly decorated for his courage and fearlessness in attacking the enemy Germans, heavily involved in the killing fields of war. As always with Phil, he gave his all to making war.

The risen Phil literally poured himself out as an oblation for an end to war and killing. He spent 11 years in jail, away from beloved wife and children, to say no to the blasphemy of napalming children and nuclear weapons. Phil’s imagination envisioned a new way of being human at a perilous cost. There are countless other stories of heroes, celebrated and anonymous. To move beyond the fear of death, perhaps we can begin to understand the Resurrection. Rather than paraphrase Alison, better to quote him.

It is in this context that we can begin to understand what it is that we celebrate when we celebrate the Resurrection. Jesus’ coming back to his disciples was the beginning of the huge cultural shift that brought into being an entirely new perception of who God is and, simultaneously, an entirely new perception of who we humans are. The Apostolic witnesses began to be able to perceive that God has nothing at all to do with human violence or the human social order that is based on human violence; rather God is so entirely outside that order that he is able to subvert it from within by taking a typical human act of violence, a lynch death, a coming together of all against one who is considered especially guilty and troublesome, and making this into the showing, the revelation of who God really is. He is not the structuring principle of human order, the prince of this world, but the purely benevolent creator of a way out of the order of this world, the self-giving victim who forgives the persecutors, permitting the construction of a non-victimary sociality. God’s goodness is shown, not in accepting a particular human sacrifice to blot out our violence, but rather in his subversion from within of the whole mendacious sacrificial order by himself giving us a sacrifice, so that we need never construct our order sacrificially again.

Lastly, Alison warns us of our stultified imaginations that shrink the landscape of our vision and hope.

We are frighteningly likely to be content with far too little . . . and so not to dare to imagine a goodness which could be ours and thus not to dare to want it, let alone to become crazed single-minded athletes of system shattering desire.

Gandhian, if you will!

Joe Bradley

Raising Abel: The Recovery of the Eschatological Imagination, New York: Crossroad, 1996 (ISBN 082451565X).

A few thoughts about this CPF newsletter

Paradigm Shift

Gary Wills, once again sounds the alarm that the perpetual state of war fostered by Bomb Power places the fate of the planet in the hands of one man―destined to rule―Pax Obama.

The infallibility of power and the ascendancy and supremacy reinforced in our American Exceptionalism threatens not only the sovernity of nations, but life itself ―clearly a paradigm that needs shifting. Unlike Neruda, our nation persists in a pre-Apollo 13 universe where maps, titles, green lines and red dictate our ethos, charter the course of global hegemony and force our hand to control an ever-shrinking pool of resources.

Rogean Cadieux-Smith

return to 10/02 CPF Newsletter